LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
LOL. HD TV for 10$ at bestbuy!
It looks like best buy made a typo for an Samsung - 52" HDTV
Samsung - 52" Class / 1080p / 120Hz / LCD HDTV - LN52A650
take advantage of it!!
I would...but i live in Canada and i cant order from that site.
i "added it to my cart" and it was $70.00 for shipping..
(but still $79 for a 52 inch tv WTF!)
I SERIOUSLY BOUGHT IT THOUGH!
MUAH HA HA HA!thanks!
yeahhh and I used one of those $5.00 reward cards... so$5.00 off w00t!
so whats the catch?
shiiiiiiiit says their delivery isn't available temporarily and i can't pick it up in store
Damn they must have caught onOriginally Posted by Incognito
I ordered it.... It is going to go in my room.
WTF!?!?!?!
Our delivery system is temporarily unavailable. Please return later to purchase any items requiring delivery. We apologize for the inconvenience. Items available for shipping or in-store pickup may still be purchased.
ddamnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
just checked it again -- "sold out online" and $1699
All well
lucky bastards
this can be closed now
Juli bought it xD
2009 Most annoying poster
2009 Biggest Noob
Proud of mah awardz
I'm easy to please, so maybe I'll think it's good.
lmao.
you probably wont get it Juli, but good luck!
What he said
I wonder how it got to $10 O_O
Now can I get a fridge for $10 dollars built in ice maker and water pouring thing O_O
2009 Most annoying poster
2009 Biggest Noob
Proud of mah awardz
I'm easy to please, so maybe I'll think it's good.
They have to or Juli can sue
its what they had it for and it wasnt Juli's fault
hell yeah ! take a pic when you get it juli !i "added it to my cart" and it was $70.00 for shipping..
(but still $79 for a 52 inch tv WTF!)
I SERIOUSLY BOUGHT IT THOUGH!
MUAH HA HA HA!
yeahhh and I used one of those $5.00 reward cards... so$5.00 off w00t!
Owned, im rob your ass juli
ownage did the same thing a coupe of month ago with a tv off another site and they never sent it to him i think.
Best Buy's $9.99 Flat Screen TV Sale a Pricing Mistake - ABC News
According to Minnesota Law:
“325F.67 FALSE STATEMENT IN ADVERTISEMENT.
Any person, firm, corporation, or association who, with intent to sell or in anywise dispose of merchandise, securities, service, or anything offered by such person, firm, corporation, or association, directly or indirectly, to the public, for sale or distribution, or with intent to increase the consumption thereof, or to induce the public in any manner to enter into any obligation relating thereto, or to acquire title thereto, or any interest therein, makes, publishes, disseminates, circulates, or places before the public, or causes, directly or indirectly, to be made, published, disseminated, circulated, or placed before the public, in this state, in a newspaper or other publication, or in the form of a book, notice, handbill, poster, bill, label, price tag, circular, pamphlet, program, or letter, or over any radio or television station, or in any other way, an advertisement of any sort regarding merchandise, securities, service, or anything so offered to the public, for use, consumption, purchase, or sale, which advertisement contains any material assertion, representation, or statement of fact which is untrue, deceptive, or misleading, shall, whether or not pecuniary or other specific damage to any person occurs as a direct result thereof, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and any such act is declared to be a public nuisance and may be enjoined as such.
The duty of a strict observance and enforcement of this law and prosecution for any violation thereof is hereby expressly imposed upon the attorney general, and it shall be the duty of the county attorney of any county wherein a violation of this section shall have occurred, upon complaint being made, to prosecute any person violating any of the provisions of this section.”
So, the law explicitly states that "whether or not pecuniary or other specific damage to any person occurs"..."any such act is declared to be a public nuisance"...
The law requires the attorney general to "prosecute any person violating any of the provisions of this section" simply because the false ad was a public nuisance.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
